Nipate
Forum => Kenya Discussion => Topic started by: Omollo on September 30, 2015, 05:12:38 PM
-
Somehow the Nation journalists who joy rode to New York can no longer find news independently. They have attached themselves to the Kenyan mission which is churning out pro jubilee propaganda. They are unable to even see through some cheap lies:
1. Uhuru's case was never deferred. The deferral application was rejected by a contemptuous UNSC. The record is still wet;
2. That somebody believes that Robert Mugabe ( I love Bob) can lead a resolution before Mzungu countries and achieve positive results is proof of the unseriousness of the entire story;
3. There is almost zero chance of the said motion making it to the Agenda. Reason: Has been previously rejected and Ruto's case is almost complete. Nothing has changed to make it a matter of International Security - the only basis upon which a matter goes before UNSC;
4. Some remarks will be counter-productive: the judges will have to think twice if their constituent was making noise against their decisions,” he explained in New York.
5. Then some things are a joke: the committee also resolved to use the floor of the UN General Assembly to push for the deferral of the case facing Sudan President Omar Al-Bashir.
-
This will take a while. If I were the defendant I will ask the court to resolve the case while am in office, otherwise they may wait till am out of office and then the case will be full blown.
-
3. There is almost zero chance of the said motion making it to the Agenda. Reason: Has been previously rejected and Ruto's case is almost complete. Nothing has changed to make it a matter of International Security - the only basis upon which a matter goes before UNSC;
It's certainly going to be tricky, given that the meeting has already started, with an agenda that was agreed on some time back and adopted around 10AM and which has nothing to do with Kenya anywhere in sight. :D
the judges will have to think twice if their constituent was making noise against their decisions,” he explained in New York.
Osuji has certainly been thinking about it. In his opinion of last month, he stated that the court should forget Rule 68, which is what everyone is worked up about, and instead admit the evidence under a different rule, because of what he called the "exceptional circumstances" of the case. As part of the exceptional circumstances, he noted that:
But, more requires to be said on the significance of Mr Khan's public pleas for the ICC to be given space to do its work. It must be observed that such a call had deserved making in this case, in light of what may be observed as a course of conducts, evidently connected to the members of both the Kenyan executive and legislative branches of government, the object of which was to prevent the trial running its course. The conducts in question include high profile campaigns on the diplomatic front, as well as parliamentary debates and resolutions.
-
Kenya has certainly been entertaining during this UNGA. Here's another good one:
http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/kenya-lobbies-cs-amina-be-un-secretary-general
-
Secretary General is a rotating seat so the next continent is Americas or Europe.