Nipate
Forum => Kenya Discussion => Topic started by: Omollo on September 05, 2014, 03:15:55 PM
-
6. Under the circumstances, it would be inappropriate for the Prosecution to withdraw the charges against Mr Kenyatta before the GoK complies with the Revised Request. First, doing so would undermine the purpose of the Chamber’s 31 March 2014 decision – to ensure that the GoK fulfils its cooperation obligations to the Court.
Second, the accused person in this case is the head of a government that has so far failed fully to comply with its obligations to the Court, and, under the Constitution of Kenya, is ultimately responsible for that failure.9 In these circumstances, the Prosecution respectfully submits that the appropriate course of action is to further adjourn the case until such time as the
GoK executes the Revised Request in full as required by the Chamber and in accordance with the Rome Statute.
Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor
Dated this 5th day of September, 2014
At The Hague, The Netherlands
[pdf]http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc1826503.pdf[/pdf]
-
So they are asking for indefinite adjournment.I think it will be granted and Uhuru case will lie in limbo until 2022 or 2032 or whenever he will loses power.
In any case this is a lost cause.
-
GOD, THE OMNIPRESENT IS WATCHING!