But problem is will private sector as much they as they create wealth redistribute the money to the poor bottom up? we are already near south africa in income inequality?
Secondly how do you bridge the huge infrastructure deficit or gap without spending a lot - public investment - in building roads, dams, etc.
The way I see - development is long term - not impact not immediate - delayed but long term more profitable- economy is short term - people having money on their pockets - like dude who never build a house or get mortgage - but drinks and eats daily - long term he will suffer.
I think at our level of undevelopment - I am not convinced about reducing public investment. Once we have bridged the infrastructure deficit - meaning everyone has clean piped water, electricity, paved roads and such basic infrastructure - we can now reduce public investment - and let private sector grow.
I am okay with gov subsidizing inputs in some revolving fund - but never outputs. I see fuel subsidy now has been bottomless pit.
Economic growth mainly driven by government expenditure always ends up with rosy gdp growth but little increase in productivity gains. The most important thing is to make sure there's robust private sector growth, this results into "pesa mfukoni". David ndii wants to reallocate government spending but still maintain the huge budgets. The supply side solution would be to slash government spending and borrowing. This would reduce crowding out of private sector, the biggest economic problem, . Narc economic recovery wasn't driven by government expenditure into SMEs and the poor but unleashing of funds that were previously being gobbled up by government. A healthy fiscally responsible country budget should be 15% of GDP, currently we are at more than 30%.