BREAKING: @IEBCKenya has opposed application by #NASA for #Audit of the KIEMS server(s) used in presidential polls. #DemocracyorSecession pic.twitter.com/eJp2gAbpzi
— D I K E M B E (@Disembe) August 26, 2017
This is a petition - not an audit.Not a fishing expedition. A petition that is heard and determine in 14 days. So NASA are just wasting time engaging in wild goose chase. Zero in one 1-10 polling station and demonstrate rigging.
25. NASA Petition: interlocutory application seeks list of technical parties with access to KIEMS,Log ins 30 days before the elections pic.twitter.com/80DLtlTPCB
— Apollo Mboya, HSC (@MboyaApollo) August 26, 2017
24. NASA Petition: interlocutory application seeks specifications of KIEMS i.e GPRS & polling station Location, IP Addresses & Audit Log pic.twitter.com/OcPSmYpglj
— Apollo Mboya, HSC (@MboyaApollo) August 26, 2017
23. NASA Petition: interlocutory application request access for purposes of scrutiny, all servers, software & operating systems pic.twitter.com/xXriBiAzp2
— Apollo Mboya, HSC (@MboyaApollo) August 26, 2017
26.NASA Petition: interlocutory application- results declared in breach of Constitution of Kenya, Elections Act & Technology Regulations pic.twitter.com/ieh9DtcaUA
— Apollo Mboya, HSC (@MboyaApollo) August 26, 2017
28. NASA Petition: interlocutory application-it is just & fair that Court & parties are granted access to all information & data sought. pic.twitter.com/dzEfLx4Kxz
— Apollo Mboya, HSC (@MboyaApollo) August 26, 2017
27. NASA Petition:KIEMS transmission system from polling stations to constituency tallying centres & to national tallying centre not secured pic.twitter.com/k5HcBpRKDW
— Apollo Mboya, HSC (@MboyaApollo) August 26, 2017
Fishing expedition. After combing through form 34As and 35Bs looking for errors - which all sum up to 1,000 votes more for Raila :) - now they want to check servers - without even demonstrating prima-facia that any rigging was done. This election was paper based.
Everybody knows majority of those forms were filled little after election results had been announced else IEBC should have beamed results with an ID label to show the polling number they were coming from. Servers audit should crack this case wide open....how did polling results get to the portal?
There is no reason to deny access to systems if only to allow NASA to confirm their fears. It will put the case to bed & NASA will forever keep their peace if their wasn't nothing untoward.
IEBC shld have auto sync backup (heartbit hot-standby backup), if not then they wasted money on technology.
?Indeed the server audit should take only a couple of hours not 3wks as Hon. Muite and Ahmednasir says....?
All parties to the petition are currently accessing the IEBC servers at Anniversary Towers. #PresidentialPetitionKe pic.twitter.com/Xzw9NLU47m
— IEBC (@IEBCKenya) August 29, 2017
Finally!
With a mere 4hrs to goAll parties to the petition are currently accessing the IEBC servers at Anniversary Towers. #PresidentialPetitionKe pic.twitter.com/Xzw9NLU47m
— IEBC (@IEBCKenya) August 29, 2017
Fishing expedition. After combing through form 34As and 35Bs looking for errors - which all sum up to 1,000 votes more for Raila :) - now they want to check servers - without even demonstrating prima-facia that any rigging was done. This election was paper based.
Ati "fishing expedition" all the time. You keep on misusing that word and its annoying. There are certain kinds of unique evidence which are discoverable because they are within the sole custody and control of the respondent or the defendant. NASA has convinced the court that they need access to this evidence to advance their petition and the court has granted it. You sound like a mad man repeating the phrase over and over again even when it does not apply. IEBC is saying that they conducted free and fair elections and NASA is simply saying, OK, lets verify. Why is that so hard to comprehend.
It not hard to comprehend that they are asking - not to verify - but to desperately find some smoking gun.Ati "fishing expedition" all the time. You keep on misusing that word and its annoying. There are certain kinds of unique evidence which are discoverable because they are within the sole custody and control of the respondent or the defendant. NASA has convinced the court that they need access to this evidence to advance their petition and the court has granted it. You sound like a mad man repeating the phrase over and over again even when it does not apply. IEBC is saying that they conducted free and fair elections and NASA is simply saying, OK, lets verify. Why is that so hard to comprehend.
The issue of "fishing expedition" was brought up appropriately by the respondent's counsel as is expected. The court found that the Petitioners overcame the burden that they are not on a "fishing expedition". I therefore do not understand why you are still stuck there. The court is quiet aware of that legal argument and they overruled it based on evidence presented by NASA. Si now just settle down and wait for the outcome.
The Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
The Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
Muite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
Muite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
The point is your selective asterisk momentsMuite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
Ok :-\. NASA did it too. Is that the point?
The point is your selective asterisk momentsMuite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
Ok :-\ . NASA did it too. Is that the point?
Nope, you're here just for that. Now, may I have your asterisk moment for Orengo?The point is your selective asterisk momentsMuite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
Ok :-\ . NASA did it too. Is that the point?
Maybe because I am not here to entertain your feelings about how I say what I see.
Nope, you're here just for that. Now, may I have your asterisk moment for Orengo?The point is your selective asterisk momentsMuite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
Ok :-\ . NASA did it too. Is that the point?
Maybe because I am not here to entertain your feelings about how I say what I see.
Show me howNope, you're here just for that. Now, may I have your asterisk moment for Orengo?The point is your selective asterisk momentsMuite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
Ok :-\ . NASA did it too. Is that the point?
Maybe because I am not here to entertain your feelings about how I say what I see.
Go fuck yourself.
Show me howNope, you're here just for that. Now, may I have your asterisk moment for Orengo?The point is your selective asterisk momentsMuite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
Ok :-\ . NASA did it too. Is that the point?
Maybe because I am not here to entertain your feelings about how I say what I see.
Go fuck yourself.
You too,where had you dumped your temperance?Show me howNope, you're here just for that. Now, may I have your asterisk moment for Orengo?The point is your selective asterisk momentsMuite is representing IEBC and he would not know anything about servers other than what IEBC is spinning. So he goes with that however little or no sense he makes. Similarly,Otiende couldn't care less what is an equation,but that's NASWA's claims and he gladly runs with it in courtThe Europe excuse is the dog ate my homework moment for Paul Muite. I still respect the guy, but this is an asterisk moment.You defend your client by crook or hook. Is his assertion less asinine than NASWA's algorithms?
What do you mean?
Ok :-\ . NASA did it too. Is that the point?
Maybe because I am not here to entertain your feelings about how I say what I see.
Go fuck yourself.
You are doing good.
Access to our serves was limited due to multiple security layers implemented. Concerned parties can now fully access as ordered by the Court
— IEBC (@IEBCKenya) August 29, 2017